Ok. I’m reading the 2232 fucking page long, Fiscal Year 2018 Omnibus spending package that was written to support the 2018 Budget. I have to say, right up front, I for one am sick of the disorganized, haphazard, sloppy work of the US Government. I don’t want to see another fucking bill slapped together with no rhyme, reason, or semblance of order.
Removing the donor-class, lobbyist-driven legislation that government shits out should be job 1. Without that, all the rest of our worrying and hand-wringing over the current state of affairs is meaningless. Right now, I’d say that job #2 is passing legislation to force the legislative branches to write goddamn legislation that is organized, thoughtful, and thoroughly rationalized.
I understand this is the golden opportunity for everyone…and I mean everyone including lobbyists, to insert their own little piece of pork barrel, anonymously…yes, anonymously, but that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be compiled with order, reason, and justification. That being said, let’s just go ahead and serve up some of the nuggets from this incredible work with example #1 of what this inane process produces:
page 1042: Ruh-roh Donny. According to 2018 Omnibus Spending Package, Trump can no longer lie.
Fake news is no longer acceptable!!!! WOOO HOOOOOO. This little clause is just sitting all alone. Not in relation or as reference to anything else. It doesn’t say how “deliberately false or misleading,” is to be determined or by whom. It doesn’t say how redress is sought or point to any other law or legislation.
Does that include any work by any federally paid employee in any venue? Surely it covers federally issued electronic and communication devices. Surely it covers any and all forms of federally disseminated information such as speeches, webpages, or physical documentation. Right?
I can’t help but think someone inserted this at 2am in the morning as a fucking joke.
page 1042: This is just above the preceding clause.
Now why is this so much more specific and delineated? Why is it just for those in a scientific advisory committee? Why wouldn’t this extend to everyone? Exactly what federal employee is political affiliation a necessary qualification? At least these guys are covered. I mean, this administration hates all scientists as a rule anyway. Fact-based truths that don’t match up with the administrations ideology is the disqualifier anyway.
page 596: GOP makes sure to increase the flow of dark money into their coffers.
page 491: related to above.
The problem with this provision is best described in this story about the hidden, dark money additions in this spending bill:
“Another provision, first implemented in a 2014 spending bill, prevents the IRS from issuing guidance or changing rules related to how the agency decides whether a non-profit group spending money on politics is a “social welfare” 501(c)(4) group under the U.S. tax code. 501(c)(4) groups are not required to disclose their donors and are allowed to engage in political activities so long as politics is not its “primary activity,” a murky standard that the IRS tried to clarify before it was prevented from doing so by spending bill riders.”
Page 617-618: Pruitt and Zinke, this ones for you!
Go ahead and read that again. If a company or organization made campaign contributions to a federal employee, whom might have occasion, to oversee whether that company or organization receives a federal contract, no one can ask of the company or organization to provide information that the federal employee is unduly influenced by said contribution. This fits in very nicely with the Administration desire to sell off or lease public lands to the fossil fuels industries for some righteous raping.
Page 1519: interesting insertion here.
Page 619: Oh no Donny! Going to have to pay for this one yourself.
Page 2199: very interesting.
Removing Section 9013 is removing the effective date of all of the serious-as-a-heart-attack laws regarding campaign finance. Each individual section of this code has it’s own effective date, pretty much. So I’m not sure if removing the effective date for the entire chapter throws the laws into limbo, or what the fuck it does. I don’t understand why this is selected for removal and why there’s no further explanation or justification.
What kind of stuff is covered in this chapter? This-